Search

Bribery Case Against Mariupol Judge Ihor Saraiev

  • Date of commencement of the case: 25/09/2019
  • Instance: HACC AC
  • Stage of criminal proceedings: Judicial proceedings
Track case progress If you would like to follow the case, leave your email and get updates sent straight to your inbox
Bribery Case Against Mariupol Judge Ihor Saraiev Bribery Case Against Mariupol Judge Ihor Saraiev

Case description

HACC has found Ihor Saraiev, a judge of the Prymorskyi District Court in Mariupol, and his assistant, Tetiana Zolotar, guilty of accepting a UAH 15,000 bribe.

According to the investigation, the judge and his assistant approached a defendant in a DUI case, offering to “discuss” the matter. During a personal meeting, Saraiev demanded UAH 15,000 in exchange for closing the case due to the expiration of the statute of limitations. He also allegedly threatened the defendant with a driver’s license suspension.

As the defendant did not have the full amount, Saraiev – though displeased – agreed to accept part of the payment upfront and wait for the remainder. He also mentioned that the case would be postponed.

In November 2018, the defendant handed over another UAH 10,000 to Zolotar, who received the money under the pretense of assisting with a motion to postpone the case. On the same day, the defendants divided the money in their office, along with the remainder of the bribe once it was paid.

Both Saraiev and Zolotar repeatedly claimed not guilty. The defense argued that the evidence was obtained unlawfully and the testimony of the person who paid the bribe was unreliable, as he had a prior criminal record. The defense also pointed out that Saraiev had ruled on the defendant’s case back in 2014, which, in their view, could have compromised the witness’ objectivity.

The accused were charged under Article 368, Part 3 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine. The court sentenced Judge Saraiev to 7.5 years in prison, with confiscation of property and a three-year ban on holding positions as a judge, prosecutor, or lawyer. Zolotar received a six-year prison sentence with the same additional penalties.

On August 27, 2021, Ihor Saraiev submitted a request to the HCJ for voluntary dismissal. The HCJ approved his request, granting him honorary retirement. As a result, he received a retirement benefit equal to three months’ salary, along with a lifetime monthly pension of UAH 100,000.

  • Proceeding No.: 42018000000002770
  • Case No.: 310/5055/19 show all cases hide other cases
  • Other court cases No.: 991/7764/24
  • Incriminated: Article 368, part 3
Instance Key parties Instance /Key parties:
HACC AC
27/12/2024

Panel of judges: Kaluhina I.O.

HACC
25/09/2019

Panel of judges: Halabala M.V.

Infographics

The Case of Ihor Saraiev

The HACC has found judge, Ihor Saraiev, and his assistant, Tetiana Zolotar, guilty of accepting UAH 15,000 in bribes for favorable decision on a DUI case.

Article 368, Part 3 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine

  • pic
    November 2018
    Saraiev and Zolotar receive the bribe
  • November 08, 2018
    Pre-trial investigation begins
  • December 2, 2021
    The HCJ dismisses Saraiev at his request
  • pic
    August 4, 2023
    The defendants are officially notified of suspicion
  • September 11, 2023
    The case is submitted to court
  • October 10, 2024
    The HACC places the defendants into custody
  • pic
    November 21, 2024
    The HACC delivers guilty verdicts: Saraiev is sentenced to 6.5 years in prison, while Zolotar receives a 6-year sentence

Decisions from the Register

Case No. Court Decision date Decision type
310/5055/19 HACC 25/09/2019 On the appointment of a preparatory court hearing
310/5055/19 HACC 15/10/2019 On the appointment of a trial
310/5055/19 HACC 28/04/2020 Decision on the implementation of remote court proceedings
310/5055/19 HACC 07/05/2020 Decision on the implementation of remote court proceedings
310/5055/19 HACC 27/05/2020 Decision on the implementation of remote court proceedings
310/5055/19 HACC 06/07/2020 Decision on the implementation of remote court proceedings
310/5055/19 HACC 08/07/2020 Decision on the implementation of remote court proceedings
310/5055/19 HACC 13/07/2020 Decision on the implementation of remote court proceedings
310/5055/19 HACC 28/07/2020 Decision on the implementation of remote court proceedings
310/5055/19 HACC 07/09/2020 Decision on the implementation of remote court proceedings
310/5055/19 HACC 01/10/2020 Decision on the implementation of remote court proceedings
310/5055/19 HACC 15/10/2020
310/5055/19 HACC 15/10/2020
310/5055/19 HACC 20/10/2020 Decision on the implementation of remote court proceedings
310/5055/19 HACC 27/10/2020 Decision on the implementation of remote court proceedings
310/5055/19 HACC 24/11/2020 Decision on the implementation of remote court proceedings
310/5055/19 HACC 23/12/2020 Decision on the implementation of remote court proceedings
310/5055/19 HACC 12/01/2021 Decision on the implementation of remote court proceedings
310/5055/19 HACC 12/05/2021 Decision on the implementation of remote court proceedings
310/5055/19 HACC 08/06/2021 Decision on the implementation of remote court proceedings
310/5055/19 HACC 30/08/2021 Decision on the implementation of remote court proceedings
310/5055/19 HACC 29/09/2021 Decision on the implementation of remote court proceedings
310/5055/19 HACC 16/12/2021 Decision on the implementation of remote court proceedings
310/5055/19 HACC 17/12/2021 Decision on the implementation of remote court proceedings
310/5055/19 HACC 17/12/2021
310/5055/19 HACC 24/01/2022 Decision on the implementation of remote court proceedings
310/5055/19 HACC 27/01/2022
310/5055/19 HACC 18/08/2022 On the suspension of court proceedings
310/5055/19 HACC 08/04/2024
310/5055/19 HACC 09/05/2024
310/5055/19 HACC 13/05/2024
310/5055/19 HACC 21/06/2024
310/5055/19 HACC 21/06/2024
991/7764/24 HACC 02/10/2024
991/7764/24 HACC 02/10/2024
310/5055/19 HACC 10/10/2024 On the imposition of an interim measure in the form of detention
310/5055/19 HACC 10/10/2024
310/5055/19 HACC 10/10/2024 On the imposition of an interim measure in the form of detention
310/5055/19 HACC 10/10/2024
310/5055/19 HACC 21/11/2024 Verdicts
310/5055/19 HACC AC 27/12/2024 Opening of appeal proceedings
310/5055/19 HACC AC 07/01/2025 Completion of the preparation and appointment of the appeal hearing