Search

The case of Ihor Petryk, former judge of the Kyiv Administrative Court of Appeal, on bribery

  • Date of commencement of the case: 19/11/2019
Track case progress If you would like to follow the case, leave your email and get updates sent straight to your inbox
The case of Ihor Petryk, former judge of the Kyiv Administrative Court of Appeal, on bribery The case of Ihor Petryk, former judge of the Kyiv Administrative Court of Appeal, on bribery

Case description

The SAPO suspects former judge Ihor Petryk of receiving a bribe of USD 5,000 for adopting the necessary decision in the case.

According to the investigation, in December 2016, a judge of the Kyiv Administrative Court of Appeal Petryk received a bribe for adopting a decision in favor of the BTU company, which is engaged in the disposal of hazardous waste. The former judge allegedly hid the money in the sewn-in inner pocket of his judicial robe.

By his decision, the judge was supposed to suspend the process of revoking the company's license for its activities. It failed the inspection of the Ministry of Ecology due to numerous violations, as a result of which the revoking of the license was initiated. The first instance court ruled in favor of the private firm, but the appeal from the ministry reached the panel, which included Judge Petryk.

 

Ihor Petryk, Source: Slovo i Dilo

The prosecution suggests that the former judge arranged a personal meeting with a representative of the firm. During the conversation, Petryk said that the case materials were “problematic,” so they needed additional study. Petryk advised the entrepreneur to file a motion to postpone the case. On the appointed day, the judge’s assistant received money in a cafe.

Petryk’s version of events is different. At first, he claimed that the money he allegedly received was family savings that he kept at work. But later, Petryk changed his version and admitted that the money was given to him by his assistant. He said that the latter was going somewhere and calling someone, and the case against him was fabricated.

Petryk’s actions were classified under Article 368, part 3 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine. In 2022, the case was suspended because Petryk was mobilized. However, the court currently continues hearing the case.

Interestingly, when asked by journalists from Bihus.Info about the role of the assistant in the case, Petryk started to run and ran almost a block from the crew. In addition, in January 2017, he was suspended. In December 2019, the High Council of Justice dismissed Petryk, a decision that was confirmed by the Supreme Court after numerous appeals.

  • Proceeding No.: 42016000000003697
  • Case No.: 757/23925/17-к
  • Incriminated: Article 368, part 3, Article 191, part 5, Article 209, part 3, Article 369-2, part 3, Article 369-2, part 2, Article 369, part 1
Instance Key parties Instance /Key parties:
HACC
19/11/2019

Panel of judges: Kruk Ye.V., Nohachevskyi V.V., Kravchuk O.O., Bilous I.O., Maslov V.V.

Lawyer: Hotin O.M., Soroky M.S., Vylkov S.V., Tereshchenka D.R., Kushkovoi N.M., Kostyniuka O.I., Ivanchyka R.B., Malovatskoho I.S., Pushkar O.A., Tkhorivskoho M.S., Rudenka S.O., Strykun D.V.

Prosecutor: Ponomarenko V.P., Harvanko I.M., Sydorenko V.A., Vysotska N.V.

Infographics

Case of Ihor Petryk

Former judge Ihor Petryk is accused of receiving a USD 5,000 bribe for adopting a decision in favor of a private firm.

Article 368, part 3 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine

  • December 1, 2016
    The head of the SAPO reported the detention of judge Petryk immediately after he received a bribe
  • pic
    December 2, 2016
    Petryk was served with a suspicion notice
  • April 26, 2017
    The Pechersk District Court received an indictment
  • June 4, 2018
    The court imposed a nighttime house arrest on Petryk and ordered that he wear an electronic bracelet
  • November 18, 2019
    The case materials were referred to the Supreme Court of Ukraine
  • November 2, 2022
    The court suspended the proceedings until Petryk's release from military service
  • May 25, 2023
    The Supreme Court of Ukraine resumed the case

Decisions from the Register

Case No. Court Decision date Decision type
757/23925/17-к HACC 19/11/2019 On the appointment of a preparatory court hearing
757/23925/17-к HACC 11/02/2020
757/23925/17-к HACC 11/02/2020
757/23925/17-к HACC 12/02/2020 On the appointment of a trial, On the extension of the period of pre-trial investigation of criminal proceedings
757/23925/17-к HACC 12/02/2020 On the appointment of a trial, On the extension of the period of pre-trial investigation of criminal proceedings
757/23925/17-к HACC 09/04/2020
757/23925/17-к HACC 15/04/2020
757/23925/17-к HACC 23/04/2020
757/23925/17-к HACC 06/05/2020
757/23925/17-к HACC 08/05/2020
757/23925/17-к HACC 14/05/2020
757/23925/17-к HACC 19/05/2020
757/23925/17-к HACC 09/06/2020
757/23925/17-к HACC 15/06/2020
757/23925/17-к HACC 16/06/2020
757/23925/17-к HACC 24/09/2020
757/23925/17-к HACC 24/09/2020
757/23925/17-к HACC 28/09/2020
757/23925/17-к HACC 28/09/2020
757/23925/17-к HACC 28/09/2020
757/23925/17-к HACC 19/10/2020
757/23925/17-к HACC 04/11/2020
757/23925/17-к HACC 11/01/2021
757/23925/17-к HACC 17/02/2021
757/23925/17-к HACC 17/02/2021
757/23925/17-к HACC 14/06/2021
757/23925/17-к HACC 14/06/2021
757/23925/17-к HACC 14/06/2021
757/23925/17-к HACC 14/06/2021
757/23925/17-к HACC 07/07/2021
757/23925/17-к HACC 07/07/2021
757/23925/17-к HACC 07/07/2021
757/23925/17-к HACC 07/07/2021
757/23925/17-к HACC 07/07/2021
757/23925/17-к HACC 07/07/2021
757/23925/17-к HACC 06/12/2021
757/23925/17-к HACC 02/11/2022 On the suspension of court proceedings
757/23925/17-к HACC 25/05/2023
757/23925/17-к HACC 15/06/2023
757/23925/17-к HACC 10/01/2024
757/23925/17-к HACC 08/04/2024
757/23925/17-к HACC 10/04/2024
757/23925/17-к HACC 15/04/2024
757/23925/17-к HACC 24/06/2024
757/23925/17-к HACC 25/06/2024
757/23925/17-к HACC 17/10/2024
757/23925/17-к HACC 18/10/2024
757/23925/17-к HACC 18/10/2024